Predictors of Health Related Quality of Life MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Predictors of Health Related Quality of Life. Answer: Introduction: The Australian Government has been urging to implement the Information System in their Healthcare Systems. They have been taking idea from the project of My Health Care (Wilis, Reynolds Keleher, 2016). An analysis has been made briefly regarding the interaction of the stakeholders with the Information System (Reed Curzon, 2015). A stakeholder map has been provided in the discussion. In addition to the questionnaires, the Use-Case Diagram of the information system is also shown. In any company the stakeholders are those who perform active operations in the health of the company. Their functionalities affect the organization. The people or the group of people who vested the interest regarding clinical decisions with proper evidences supporting decisions is called the stakeholders (Dalton-Brown, 2016). There are four types of stakeholders for the heath-care provided at present: They include doctors, staffs and nurses. The doctor posses large interest as they receive huge help from the data. The nurses and other staffs also get benefits from the operations. They include the healthcare owners. The CEOs are also considered here as they show interests as they could perform their tasks easily by this. Finally, the administrator is there whose major concern lies in system operation. The Australian government is an example of this. They have been always concerning about the wellbeing of common people (Ziaian et al., 2015). Another example in this area is the investors. They gets interest due to the financial profits. Ten questions are estimated that are displayed hereafter: Find out the general effect of the "My Health Record". How much advantage from this framework has been conveyed to you? Is there any impact of the framework observed over your patient? Can you evaluate what amount the treatment costs have influenced usually? Is there any new disease originated related to the system? Any finding of new sickness requires some time. Could you decide what amount of time utilized has affected? According to experience could the answer on the impact of the framework on general public be given? Have you found any downside in the framework? Examine the downsides of the framework. There can be any further suggestions for the framework. Is enough of that found? Declaim such suggestions. How much might you want to rate your system out of ten marks? The Brief Use Case Descriptions: Use-Case Name Login Scenario The trigger Event Users require accessing the services. Brief description The user should login into the system. Actors Patients Doctors Preconditions The login id with the password entered submitted Post-conditions The user has logged in successfully. Use-Case Name Registration Scenario The system uses the information from clinical systems. Trigger Event The clinical system record data about new doctors or patients. Brief description The system keeps the basic data in the storage. Actors Patients Doctors Clinical Systems Preconditions New user accesses inside the system Post-conditions The user successfully registered Use-Case Name The Patient Health Record Entry Scenario The doctors inputs most recent discoveries in the treatment of patients. Trigger Event The doctors would store the most recent treatment related data. Brief description The record of the patient keeps the overhauled information about the treatment. Actors Doctors Clinical Systems Preconditions The doctors puts updated information Post-conditions Information successfully stored Use Case Name Update Record Scenario The doctors get modification in their old medicines. The treatment techniques get changed. Trigger Event Problems in old treatment Brief description The doctors supplant the medication. The methodology of medications is changed. After the distinguishing proof of changes, the test outcomes are additionally changed as needs be. Actors Doctors Clinical Systems Preconditions Doctors input updated information. Post-conditions Data upgraded successfully. Use-Case Name Searching Patient Record Scenario The doctors approved look for the records of particular patients. Trigger Event Scanning of patient related information for good treatment. Brief description Scanning of patient related information for good treatment. Actors Doctors Clinical Systems Preconditions Doctors look for the information about patient treatment. Post-conditions Information successfully updated Fully Developed Use Case Description: Use Case Name Patient Health Record Entry Scenario The doctors have discovered most recent discoveries in the treatment of the patients. Trigger Event The doctors have been putting away most recent information with respect to the treatment. Brief description The patient has been recording updated information about the treatment. Actors Doctors Clinical Systems Stakeholders Patient Doctor Hospitals Preconditions Doctors would enter latest information. Post-conditions Information successfully stored. Flow of the activities Actors Systems 1. The doctors send solicitations to get to patient record. 2. The doctors enter new information like indications, the test outcomes, and the prescription. 3. Doctors gets the message that the passage has been done effectively. 1. The frameworks check approval. 2. The frameworks convey access to doctors. 3. The frameworks check the information verification. 4. The framework keeps the most recent information effectively in their capacity. Exception Condition 1. The user data corrupted. 2. The patient visiting other experts. Conclusion: It could be ended by saying that the report has contained the brief investigation of the system. The healthcare project has been possessing exceptional difficulties and prerequisites of their own. It includes the administrative and the security concerns. The report has helped in figuring out how viably these difficulties could be taken care of. Particular methodologies have been demonstrated with respect to the project objectives, alleviating the difficulties and dangers. These have been regular to each health-care field. Specific difficulties to convey this idea to reality have been recommended. The report has created questionnaires where ten inquiries have been shown. This would help in the study to successfully comprehend the project. References: Cahill, J., McLoughlin, S., Wetherall, S. (2016, December). The specification of new technology to support assisted living (AL) from a biopsychosocial, stakeholder relationship and ethics perspective. InComputational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), 2016 International Conference on(pp. 1385-1386). IEEE. Dalton-Brown, S. (2016). Healthcare in Australia.Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,25(03), 414-420. Dungey, S., Glew, S., Heyes, B., Macleod, J., Tate, A. R. (2016). Exploring practical approaches to maximising data quality in electronic healthcare records in the primary care setting and associated benefits. Report of panel-led discussion held at SAPC in July 2014.Primary health care research development,17(05), 448-452. Haddad, P., Gregory, M., Wickramasinghe, N. (2014). Evaluating business value of IT in healthcare in Australia: the case of an intelligent operational planning support tool solution.submitted Bled econference, Bled June. Haddad, P., Schaffer, J. L., Wickramasinghe, N. (2015, August). Evaluating Business Value of IT in Healthcare: Three Clinical Practices from Australia and the US. InMedInfo(pp. 183-187). Hoskins, A., Johnson, S., Bennett, N., Bull, A., Richards, M., Worth, L. (2016). Developing healthcare worker influenza vaccination as a hospital performance indicator.Infection, Disease Health,21(3), 123. Kettunen, J. (2015). Stakeholder relationships in higher education.Tertiary Education and Management,21(1), 56-65. Qin, B., Deng, H., Wu, Q., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Naccache, D., Zhou, Y. (2015). Flexible attribute-based encryption applicable to secure e-healthcare records.International Journal of Information Security,14(6), 499-511. Reed, M. S., Curzon, R. (2015). Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review.Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences,12(1), 15-38. Sabharwal, S., Sibal, R., Kaur, P. (2014, December). Deriving Complexity Metric based on Use Case Diagram and its validation. InSignal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on(pp. 000102-000107). IEEE. Singh, A., Sharma, E. S. (2014). Functional Test Cases Generation Based on Automated Generated Use Case Diagram.International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE), (8). Somolinos, R., Muoz, A., Hernando, M. E., Pascual, M., Cceres, J., Snchez-de-Madariaga, R., ... Salvador, C. H. (2015). Service for the pseudonymization of electronic healthcare records based on ISO/EN 13606 for the secondary use of information.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics,19(6), 1937-1944. Thomas, J. S., Gilbert, T. R., Thompson, C. H. (2017). Preparing the future workforce for healthcare in Australia.Future Hospital Journal,4(1), 67-71. Weaver, C. A., Ball, M. J., Kim, G. R., Kiel, J. M. (2016). Healthcare information management systems.Cham: Springer International Publishing. Willis, E., Reynolds, L., Keleher, H. (Eds.). (2016).Understanding the Australian health care system. Elsevier Health Sciences. Windsor, J., Searle, J., Hanney, R., Chapman, A., Grigg, M., Choong, P., ... Smith, J. A. (2015). Building a sustainable clinical academic workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of Australia and New Zealand: report from the first summit meeting.Internal medicine journal,45(9), 965-971. Ziaian, T., de Anstiss, H., Antoniou, G., Puvimanasinghe, T., Baghurst, P. (2015). Sociodemographic Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life and Healthcare Service Utilisation among Young Refugees in South Australia.Open Journal of Psychiatry,6(01), 8.